<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ancient Wisdom Today &#187; Canonical Criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/category/canonical-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org</link>
	<description>Ancient Wisdom Today: seeking to understand the past to make sense of the present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Authors and Divine Authority</title>
		<link>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/01/09/authors-and-divine-authority/</link>
		<comments>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/01/09/authors-and-divine-authority/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canonical Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Authorship of Isaiah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Seitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Levenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mosaic Authorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img border="0" src="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/images/authors_and_divine_authority.jpg" align="left" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px"/> In a <a href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/?p=43">previous post</a>, I mentioned Brevard Childs’ understanding of Mosaic authorship as a claim that “functioned as a norm by which to test the tradition’s authority.” Then we saw James Kugel’s <a href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/?p=52">long answer</a> to the question: was the Pentateuch written by Moses?</p>
<p>To many people that accept some version of the Documentary Hypothesis or who believe that, regardless of how the Pentateuch came to be, it wasn’t written by Moses, this may be a moot question – a question that only the religious-minded would ask. The link between Childs and Kugel, to use but one example, is that these are men who read the Bible critically but are also part of a community whose tradition is at odds with their critical reading.</p>
<p><a href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/01/09/authors-and-divine-authority/" class="more-link">Read more on Authors and Divine Authority&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/01/09/authors-and-divine-authority/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brevard Childs&#8217; Intro to the OT</title>
		<link>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2008/10/23/brevard-childs-intro-to-the-ot/</link>
		<comments>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2008/10/23/brevard-childs-intro-to-the-ot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canonical Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Old Testament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brevard Childs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mosaic Authorship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/?p=43</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I am working my way through Brevard Childs’ <em>Introduction to the OT as Scripture </em>(Fortress Press, 1979). The more I read it, the more I like his approach. Now I want to see how his methodology is going to play out in practice.</p>
<p>	His canonical approach does raise some issues, and I was pleasantly surprised that every time I had a question, he either answered it or at least gave me enough to think about. One of the questions I had was about textual criticism since I wanted to know when we would start to talk about a “canon” of the OT when things seemed to be so fluid in the first century. Not only that, why should I even limit myself to the first century? What is the role of the canonical shape of scriptures throughout its entire history?</p>
<p><a href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2008/10/23/brevard-childs-intro-to-the-ot/" class="more-link">Read more on Brevard Childs&#8217; Intro to the OT&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2008/10/23/brevard-childs-intro-to-the-ot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
