<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ancient Wisdom Today &#187; NPP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/category/npp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org</link>
	<description>Ancient Wisdom Today: seeking to understand the past to make sense of the present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 16:09:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>N. T. Wright is Pretty Clever</title>
		<link>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/09/05/n-t-wright-is-pretty-clever/</link>
		<comments>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/09/05/n-t-wright-is-pretty-clever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 18:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N. T. Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Perspective on Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/?p=570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A discussion panel entitled <a href="http://www.sbts.edu/resources/chapel/chapel-fall-2009/panel-nt-wright-and-the-doctrine-of-justification-2/">N.T. Wright and the Doctrine of Justification</a> just came to my attention. The panelists are Dr. R. Albert Mohler, Jr., Dr. Denny Burk, Dr. Tom Schreiner, Dr. Mark Seifrid and Dr. Brian Vickers. I have expressed before frustration with the tone of such panels and surprise that people of the caliber of these scholars keep making distorted statements about what N. T. Wright has to say about justification. But, what I found particularly interesting was the quote below by Dr. Mohler which probably says a lot about the way some Evangelicals perceive N. T. Wright:</p>
<blockquote><p>“In reading through his [Wright’s] work, listening to his lectures, having met him and having heard him, engaging in discussion with him, I think of the British meaning of the word &#8220;clever.&#8221; He is extremely clever. And, in this sense, I dare say that this cleverness is a real issue because it also comes hand in hand with an incredible, almost unspeakable, audacity because his claim is no less than that the protestant reformers and their heirs have misunderstood not only Paul and not only first century Judaism, but the doctrine of justification and thus the gospel.”</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/09/05/n-t-wright-is-pretty-clever/" class="more-link">Read more on N. T. Wright is Pretty Clever&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/09/05/n-t-wright-is-pretty-clever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>N. T. Wright on Justification</title>
		<link>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/05/08/n-t-wright-on-justification/</link>
		<comments>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/05/08/n-t-wright-on-justification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 19:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Maer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[N. T. Wright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Perspective on Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px" src="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/images/wright_justification.jpg" border="0" alt="" align="left" /> I am currently reading N. T. Wright’s book  <em>Justificaion: God’s Plan and Paul’s Vision</em> which is basically a response to John Piper’s book <em>The Future of Justification</em>. Although he interacts with Piper at various points in the book, it is not a point by point response which, in my opinion, makes it a much better read. I have read the first part of the book and gotten through his exegesis of Galatians. For those familiar with Wright’s work on this subject, there is probably not going to be a lot that is new, but I am finding that Wright is (re)explaining things in this book in a way that is proving to be extremely helpful for my understanding of justification and Paul in general. I specially appreciated his spending some time explaining exactly what he means by “covenant” (as in <em>God’s righteousness</em> being <em>God’s faithfulness to the covenant</em>). I won’t attempt to summarize it here because it is exactly within the context of all that he is saying in this book that “covenant” makes sense. All I can say is that people should read this book and try to listen to what Wright is saying.</p>
<p><a href="http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/05/08/n-t-wright-on-justification/" class="more-link">Read more on N. T. Wright on Justification&#8230;</a></p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://maer.vidanovaphilly.org/2009/05/08/n-t-wright-on-justification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
